Prince Harry didn’t maintain a lot again in his controversial autobiography, Spare. He shared details about Prince William, Kate Middleton, King Charles, and extra. One bit of knowledge some folks suppose he ought to have withheld is how many individuals he killed whereas he was in the army. Former US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta shared his ideas in a latest interview.
Prince Harry centered on the flawed element, says Leon Panetta
Panetta spoke with Piers Morgan about Prince Harry’s revelation that he killed 25 Taliban fighters. The previous protection secretary says Harry ought to have centered on the mission as an alternative of the variety of folks he killed.
“Based on my experience both in the military and as secretary of defense, I have to tell you the strongest warriors I knew in battle were those who focused on the mission and not how many individuals on the other side they killed,” says Panetta throughout an interview on Sky News Australia. “They focused on whether or not the mission was accomplished. I think Prince Harry would have done better to focus on the missions that he was involved with rather than counting the number of the dead.”
Leon Panetta believes Prince Harry ought to make modifications to his autobiography
Panetta went on to say he thinks Harry might have dealt with the state of affairs higher. He agreed with Piers when he requested if he thought Harry ought to make modifications to future printings of Spare.
“I do think he could have handled this better as a soldier,” says Panetta. “I think that when you start to detail how many have been killed, then in some ways that becomes the issue. What I’m offended by, frankly, is the distortion of focusing on numbers killed rather than the mission he was involved with, which I think was a strong mission, an important mission to go after the Taliban and those who were involved in the attack on 9/11. This was an important mission, and that’s what ought to be focused on.”
Panetta continues, “So if in some way he could rewrite this or include the missions he was involved in without referring to the number of people that were killed, I think that would frankly represent a fairer description of what he was involved with in his service.”
While Panetta says Harry most likely did his job as a solider, he believes his feedback concerning the Taliban fighters takes away from his accomplishments. “I’m sure he performed well; I’m sure he did his service to his country, and I think that’s important,” says Panetta. “But I think saying the number of people that were killed frankly detracts both from the mission and from the service that he provided.”
Prince Harry says it’s a ‘dangerous lie’ that he ‘boasted’ about how many individuals he killed in Afghanistan
Throughout his interview with Stephen Colbert, Harry says the “most dangerous lie” the media instructed was that he “boasted” about how many individuals he killed in Afghanistan. Harry says if he heard somebody boasting about one thing like this, he can be upset.
“If I heard anyone boasting about that kind of thing, I would be angry,” Harry tells Colbert. “But it’s a lie. And hopefully, now that the book is out people will be able to see the context.”
Harry says the way in which his assertion is offered in the media is harmful. “It’s really troubling and very disturbing that [the media] can get away with it, because they have the context. That’s dangerous. And my words are not dangerous, but the spin of my words are very dangerous.”
Why did Prince Harry reveal how many individuals he killed in Afghanistan?
One query Harry addressed was why he revealed the variety of folks he killed. He says his intention was to assist different troopers and encourage them to share what they’ve skilled. He believes his openness may save a life.
“I made the choice to share it because having spent nearly two decades with veterans all around the world, I think the most important thing is to be honest and to be able to give space to others to be able to share their experiences without any shame,” says Harry. (*25*)
Observe Sheiresa Ngo on Twitter.