Former actuality star Josh Duggar’s workforce of attorneys is combating a bit of controversial proof on his baby pornography case. Particularly, his attorneys are pushing again in opposition to {a photograph} of Duggar taken quickly after his April arrest that the prosecution intends to make use of in opposition to him in courtroom. In accordance with leaked courtroom paperwork, the photograph in query connects Duggar to a number of the photographs the feds took from his pc, which might show troublesome to the 19 Children And Counting star.
Josh Duggar’s Lawyers Push Again In opposition to Jail Photos
Following his arrest, Josh Duggar allegedly posed for pictures that his protection workforce is now pushing again in opposition to. In accordance with courtroom paperwork obtained by RadarOnline, Duggar’s lawyer is asking for pictures taken of his shopper’s fingers and toes from “atypical angles” whereas in jail not be allowed as proof in opposition to him.
Prosecutors apparently intend to argue that these jail photographs present a scar on Duggar’s hand that hyperlink him to photographs taken from his laptop computer. “Law enforcement observed the same scar in images recovered from the defendant’s electronic devices seized pursuant to a search warrant in this case,” attorneys for the federal government defined.
The disgraced actuality star’s workforce argue that the one photograph allowed to be taken with out a warrant is a mug shot, together with his lawyer writing, “What is particularly egregious about HSI’s conduct in this capacity is that Duggar’s body parts were manipulated, and he was required to pose for the photographs.”
Prosecution Begs To Differ
Prosecutors have pushed again in opposition to these claims, insisting {that a} member of Homeland Safety requested Duggar to take the photographs and that he consented. “At no time during this process did the special agent or any other law enforcement officers involved in the processing of the defendant raise their voice at him, intimidate him, or verbally or physically threaten him,” the prosecution argued within the paperwork.
Moreover, the prosecution continued, “Law enforcement’s photographing of the defendant’s hands did not constitute an unreasonable or warrantless search of the defendant.” They went on to argue that this wasn’t a case of asking the defendant to take away an article of clothes to ensure that officers to {photograph} part of his physique that will in any other case be coated. “As made clear by the photographs included in the defendant’s motion, his hands were in plain view and clearly visible.”
Josh Duggar’s trial is predicted to happen in November. Because the case remains to be ongoing, we shall be checking again in with new updates as they turn out to be obtainable.
